The impact of the tsunami in Thailand and Indonesia, Bangladesh et al, Hurricane Katrina in the US, Typhoons Ondoy, Pepeng, Frank and Lupit in the Philippines reveals a pattern of serious defects in the political, economic, cultural, psycho-social institutions that direly need to be addressed in the present time without delay.

More about this post here

As if Hurricane Katrina in the US, iceberg meltdown in the North Pole, the Typhoons Frank, Ondoy, Pepeng, Lupit in the Philippines and the tsunamis of Southeast Asia were not enough, the world has to prepare from between 2010 – 2013 for severe space storms caused by what NASA predicted  as solar maximum occurrence similar to the solar storm British astronomer Richard Carrington observed in 1859.NASA reports that:

The 1859 storm – known as the “Carrington Event” after astronomer Richard Carrington who witnessed the instigating solar flare — electrified transmission cables, set fires in telegraph offices and produced Northern Lights so bright that people could read newspapers so bright that people could read newspapers by their red and green glow.  A recent report by the National Academy of Sciences found that if a similar storm occurred today, it could case $1 to 2 trillion in damages to society’s high-tech infrastructure and require four to ten years for complete recovery. For comparison, Hurricane Katrina caused “only $80 to 125 billion in damage. See the NASA forecast here

The need to plot strategies, programs, plans and target activities for when this event will happen is the reason for the 2010 Geo Hazard Mapping and Environment Summit. Despite the HMES 2010 advocacy to strengthen the gathering of information from outer space, using high technology implements, there is absolutely no contradiction to proposing measures to undertake mapping while knowing fully well about the forthcoming severe space event.

HMES 2010 is merely a pro-active measure to produce a wholly functional cooperation on creating the road map today for what is to take place between 2010 or 2011 up to 2013.While it is true that GIS could be reliant upon information from outer space, the heart of the HMES 2010 conference is to plot out a mechanism whereby a highly usable hazard map would be drawn today, before the space storms happen and other more dangerous disasters take place and put in place special contingency plans for unveiling and assembling properly stored devices unharmed from the effects of the magnetic storm.  For all purposes and intents, the replacement equipment and infrastructure might be downgrades of the original structure destroyed by the solar calamity, making do with earth based remote sensing and even line of sight data and digital video transmission, at least the world will not be blind.

The organizers of HMES 2010 envisioned creating from out of the existing world geo hazard map, a back up hazard GIS and response plan that will be maximum safe kept  — possibly in a demagnetized environment — and taken out when the Carrington-event type of disaster or the combination of that event and other calamities strikes the planet.

All manner of the needed humanitarian activities should already be laid out in advance and implemented to a ‘T’ at the appointed time.

Since this is not easily done, the UN member nations must agree to the proposal, vote as one and willingly sign the attendant declaration of solidarity.

———————————————————————

Possibly related articles:

• Solar storm: Preparing satellite infrastructure
  
• Disaster Scenarios on a solar super storm
  
• Scientists on solar super storm
  
• SunEarthDay – NASA: Some Good News On The Solar Super Storm
  

On Monday, October 26, 2009, the ABS-CBN News Channel (ANC) held an ANC Forum dubbed as “Wired for Disasters”.  Figures from the academe and science were invited by ANC and participated in the forum.   The ABS-CBN website published a brief item about the forum on the internet.

Mahar Lagmay of the University of the Philippines National Institute of Geological Sciences (UP-NIGS) said that they are developing a map of flood-prone areas with the help of UP-NIGS research assistants and the Ateneo de Manila University’s Manila Observatory.

The map will serve as a warning in future disasters. Lagmay said, “That [Ondoy disaster] happened because we were not aware that that kind of disaster could happen.”

THE IMPORTANCE OF THE CLIMATE CHANGE LAW – SEC. LITO ATIENZA

October 26, 2009

The Climate Change Act of 2009, which President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo signed into law, puts local government units into the center stage of governance, given the important roles city, town, and barangay leaders play in the implementation of whatever plans and programs on climate change adaptation and mitigation measures that will be crafted by a body tasked under the new law.

The substance and efficacy of Republic Act (RA) 9729 will only be as good as those executing climate change measures. The new law may even be a potent tool in bringing about a stronger green-minded electorate because of the centrality to local elected officials in mainstreaming the climate change agenda into their platforms of governance at the provincial and down to the barangay level.

See more about Sec. Atienza’s post here…

My colleague Earl, one of the organizers of HMES, recently visiting from Kuala Lumpur complains:

• They are building a high rise tower in Shaw Boulevard. The edge of the building is the very edge of the sidewalk, hugging the street with all the affection it can give.
  
• Who approved that kind of design? Who gave permission for that building to be built?
  
• Look at Manila Water and Maynilad, they’ve been cutting all streets in several pieces and not returning them to their original shape. And the MWSS and MMDA, the DPWH doesn’t care about sewerages. Just keep building the streets, repairing, rebuilding, but all for terrible waste of public funds.
  
• That kind of mentality makes people here prone to risk, danger, disaster, etc., etc.
  
• Back in Malaysia, you look at the streets, they’re all wide and spacious and no buildings impose themselves on the streets nor on the sidewalks.
  
• Now in Malaysia, all permits for building are evaluated through the criteria of Green Technology. That’s how they are now in Malaysia.
  
• The Philippines is doing the opposite; clearly we are headed for bigger disasters in the future.
  

Returning from Japan last year, Mr. Michael Buquid says: “They build their streets, bridges, etc. differently in Japan. They build them in layers and layers that when it rains, you can’t even see water piling up to a few millimeters on the street surface. All of the rainwater get’s soaked up inside the layers. It might be raining hard in Tokyo streets and bridges, but you can see the surface. No rain piles up on top. Amazing!”

And of course we were told long ago how a Japanese architect instructed a local contractor: “You Filipinos build street first. Then when remember, you build sewer. Japan, many years ago already, we do not first build street; we build sewer. If sewer working, we put street on top.” Good. But that was said in 1990. It is now 2009.

Well, one doesn’t have to go all that far. In Sendakan, that is only a stone’s throw away from one of the Philippines’ last island in the far Southerns, Taganak Island (it’s so small you wonder how they even got a Chinese Mayor there), they’re so environment conscious. Sendakan people have been very guarding and protective of their home towns and home province and the even birds frequent their place. That made them a bird watchers’ paradise. They earn so much tourist revenues just from bird watchers. I’m even writing a book slowly about that subject.

Some coordination the soon-to-be created, new Climate Change Commission will be doing indeed.

And what about the Philippine version of the Japanese buraku min who thrive in our own sewerages and the sewers and other areas underneath bridges?

Tweaking Disaster Response

Create Agreement in paper on the move to change policy regimes, establish new framework, parameters in dealing with geo-hazards, disasters, emergency response and other possible crisis applications and the making full-function Geoinformation Technology (GIT) Infrastructure available to all

• The United Nations recently made a worldwide Flash Appeal for US$75,000,000 for the Philippines immediately in the aftermath of Typhoon Ondoy.

• Many NGOs and governments raised funds to donate to the Philippines for relief and other humanitarian purposes.

• Flooding, drought and other pernicious effects of climate change and the land mass shifts and changes, shifting of the North and South Poles, wetlands transformation and radical alteration of the landscape after the 1991 Pinatubo and 1990 Baguio Earthquake among other geological, similar natural and man-made events, will not stop.

• The future of the country in confronting calamities is uncertain in areas where people refuse to cooperate, fiercely resist efforts to relocate them from their present niche despite the high risk from calamities, disasters or simply shun any other efforts to forestall dangers to life and property. Government will not be inclined to remove them by force.

• There is obviously a need for a broad policy regime change, a paradigm shift, to enable government to undertake interventions to reduce hazards;  and,

• A culture shift for people not to stand in the way of reform, change and intervention.

• US$75-M is not nearly enough to pay for 10 S-Band Doppler Radars for the Philippines and put them into commission.

• This kind of money is not substantial to launch 9 satellites to parallel India, for the Philippines has only one satellite while India has a total of 10.

• The shift needed to wean mankind from the conventional wisdom that information from outer space is supposed to be very confidential and that storm detection radars and GIT Infrastructure is unaffordable should be debunked.

• Ultimately, for our survival, GIT and other facilities and their output should be made available for the poor nations.

• HMES 2010 seeks to directly focus on these solutions.

Mission

• Create Agreement in paper on the move to change policy regimes, establish new framework, parameters in dealing with geo-hazards, disasters, emergency response and other possible crisis applications and the making full-function Geoinformation Technology (GIT) Infrastructure available to all.
  

HMES 2010 Specific Objectives

• Build a full scale, manual and computer coded climate change risk map including all available overlay data sets.
  
• Propose new policy advocacies for the new millennium on disaster forecasting, management and interventions.
  
• Identify non-functional framework, obsolescent parameters and technologies that should be shelved and disseminate and delist from future acquisitions by end-user states
  
• Identify Partners Clusters in building integrated GIS for the following applications:

Priority 1

Priority 1

Priority 1

Priority 1

Priority 2

Priority 2

Priority 3

Priority 3

After the Summit, a closing event called One Festival Live 2010 the purpose of which are shown below:

Mission

• Create awareness of the need for national and global cooperation, coordinating , sharing resources, technology, time, creativity for the welfare of victims of disasters both from natural calamities and man-made disasters or technical failures

• Dramatize the importance of sharing to minimize risk and damage to life, resources.
  

• Dramatize the need for changing policy regimes in government and non-government, people-based environmental and resource management paper on new framework, parameters for a full-function Geoinformation Technology (GIT) Infrastructure for geo-hazards, disasters, emergency response and other possible crisis applications.